Prayer in public meetings goes against the grain of our Bill of Rights

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that prayers that open town council meetings do not violate the Constitution even if they routinely stress Christianity (Town of Greece v. Galloway), thus overturning a 2012 federal appeals court ruling upholding the separation of church and state.

 Writing the dissenting opinion for the Court’s four liberal justices, Justice Elena Kagan said the case differs from a 1983 Court decision upholding opening prayers because in that case the invocations did not involve public participation. The issue in Greece v. Galloway, on the other hand, was that predominantly sectarian invocations are given directly to, and involve participation by, citizens.

 Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for the five conservative justices, said the prayers are ceremonial and in keeping with the nation’s traditions. Some of these traditions are:

 If you’re a Jew, Hindu or any other Non-Christian, you are well-advised to participate -- or pretend to participate -- in the Christian prayer to avoid being treated unfairly by the political body involved, or by your fellow citizens who are Christians.

 If you are a non-Christian, it is best to pretend to be a Christian in order to be elected to public office. People vote for political candidates based on their religious beliefs, not on their records or the policies they propose.

 Christianist political bodies and electorates discourage public participation by non-Christians who might otherwise make valuable contributions to their communities.

 In a nation that is more religiously diverse than when the Bill of Rights was written in the 18th century, this decision boggles the mind. Given the current leaning of our Supreme Court, the only practical difference between the United States and theocracies such as Iran, Saudi Arabia, Nepal or Tibet might well boil down to which holidays we celebrate.

 Richard E. Wackrow, Whitefish